Showing posts with label Phenomenological. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Phenomenological. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 23, 2019

I Corinthians 10:1-11 - Explicit and Implicit Teaching

I Corinthians 10:1-11
1 For I do not want you to be unaware, brethren, that our fathers were all under the cloud and all passed through the sea; 2 and all were baptized into Moses in the cloud and in the sea; 3 and all ate the same spiritual food; 4 and all drank the same spiritual drink, for they were drinking from a spiritual rock which followed them; and the rock was Christ. 5 Nevertheless, with most of them God was not well-pleased; for they were laid low in the wilderness.
6 Now these things happened as examples for us, so that we would not crave evil things as they also craved. 7 Do not be idolaters, as some of them were; as it is written, “The people sat down to eat and drink, and stood up to play.” 8 Nor let us act immorally, as some of them did, and twenty-three thousand fell in one day. 9 Nor let us try the Lord, as some of them did, and were destroyed by the serpents. 10 Nor grumble, as some of them did, and were destroyed by the destroyer.11 Now these things happened to them as an example, and they were written for our instruction, upon whom the ends of the ages have come.

Message: Explicit and Implicit Teaching

Time: This epistle was written to the church that resided in Corinth of Achaia. First Corinthians is a response to a letter that Paul received from the Corinthian church, and that letter was probably a response to another of Paul's letters. This letter was composed in Ephesus around AD 54-55, and such topics as division, sexual immorality, lawsuits, marriage, Christian liberty, order of worship, and the resurrection are covered in this epistle.

What the Lord is Saying:

I continue to examine the different forms of literature that we have in our Bible. The Bible is the Word of God. It is God's special revelation to His people and it is the final revelation. The books that we have of the Canon are complete. This Word equips us to do every good work and apply every good thing in our lives. We can trust it. It is to be interpreted literally, but we also realize that there are different language types it has. There are non-literal ways lie phenomenological which describes things the way they appear, like the sun stood still and anthropomorphic language which describes God as having human attributes, like fingers and hands, though he is a spirit. Personification gives personal characteristics to impersonal entities like trees clapping their hands and mountains singing. Hyperbole exaggerates to make a point as the story of the mustard seed begins with this tiny seed and then grows so people can sit in it. Metaphor is a very common one to use a word for one thing that is meant for something else, like Jesus saying I am the door or the light.

All of this forms helps us to better understand what we are reading. The goal is to interpret texts correctly as religions have been started based upon interpretation and many of the different belief systems focus on different ways to interpret. Thus, as we study each passage it is the explicit, direct teaching of the passage that must control our interpretation of that passage.

By explicit instruction, we mean teaching where the instructor clearly outlines what the learning goals are for the reader, and offers clear, unambiguous explanations of the skills and information structures they are presenting. The text referenced here, I Corinthians 10 is an example of explicit teaching as Paul describes things in order that we would not crave evil things. He says Do not be idolaters...Nor let us act immorally...Nor let us try the Lord...nor grumble. These commandments are clear do's and don't in our Bible, and thus the teaching is explicit.

By implicit instruction, we refer to teaching where the instructor does not outline such goals or make such explanations overtly, but rather simply presents the information or problem to the student and allows the student to make their own conclusions and create their own conceptual structures and assimilate the information in the way that makes the most sense to them. An example of this from Scripture would be the telling of the resurrection of Jesus in the Gospels. All four gospels mentions this miracle that occurred - the presence of angels, a heavy stoned rolled away, the appearance of Jesus. None of the Gospels state that God raised Jesus from the dead but this is a natural conclusion. The doctrine of the Trinity would be another example of implicit instruction. Nowhere is that term used in scripture, but we have the Father, Jesus, and the Spirit all with the same God-like attributes. Thus, the instruction provides to us the conclusion of the three persons of God. 

Exodus 32:14 says that the Lord changed His mind about the harm which He said He would do to His people. Now did the Lord really change His mind? Numbers 23:19 says - “God is not a man, that He should lie, Nor a son of man, that He should repent; Has He said, and will He not do it? Or has He spoken, and will He not make it good? So here Numbers says that God does not lie, so how could he change his mind? Numbers 23:19 is explicit teaching. Thus, the description in Exodus 32:14 of God changing his mind is anthropomorphic or giving us human attributes. God knew the plan and to us the appearance was that he changed his mind, but He knew what He would do all along. He does not change His mind like we change ours. 

Thus it is important to allow the explicit passages to help define the meaning of the implicit ones. Thus, the explicit teaching of Numbers 23:19 helps guide our learning of other scriptures. This is an important distinction where we need to understand the way the Bible is being written. 

Promise: It is common for belief systems to take implicit teachings and make them explicit but these explicit teachings contradict other teachings. If there are contradictions in scripture then our beliefs are shallow and we cannot believe anything it says. 

Prayer: Lord, again, thank you for this understanding. You are illuminating my understanding of Scripture. You are providing me the different language types in scripture that help shed light on the reading and understand of Your word. You are a great God. You never change. Help others to understand this teaching so that it can illuminate our understanding of You.


Note: I follow the readings from the Tabletalk Magazine devotional, though I am a little behind and working through 2017 devotionals. 2017 is a study of key biblical doctrines with February being about the doctrine of revelation and the various aspects of the doctrine of Scripture that sola Scriptura seeks to preserve.

Monday, January 21, 2019

Ecclesiastes 8:1 - The Language of Scripture

Ecclesiastes 8:1
Who is like the wise man and who knows the interpretation of a matter?

Message: The Language of Scripture

Time:  Solomon's authorship is not stated. Solomon's reign as king of Israel lasted from around 970 B.C. to around 930 B.C. The Book of Ecclesiastes was likely written towards the end of his reign, approximately 935 B.C.

What the Lord is Saying:

Once the scriptures are identified through the Canon of Scripture concluding that these are the Scriptures that are inspired by God and the final revelation from God to His people it is important to look at now the interpretation of Scripture. I have stated previously that the way the Bible is interpreted means everything for this has resulted in many of the different denominations and even belief systems we have today. In addition, there is often much confusion when it comes to the Bible for people think that there is a special way of reading the text and understanding it, almost like there is a secret code. At times, I wonder if this is said because people want something from God - like those that were walking around at the time of Jesus - as they wanted healing or escape from there present circumstances and so what they find difficult is accessing what they want.

The most basic principle is to interpret the Bible literally. Thus, read it according to the intent of the authors. Yes, there are different literary styles used - poetry, historical narrative, proverb, epistle, parable, sermon, prophecy, and others. I would agree that sometimes prophecy contains imagery, metaphors and allegories that are somewhat difficult to determine, but that is a small portion of our Bible. Thankfully today we have the Bible in multiple translations that provide it to us in our own language. I am thankful for the scholars that have vested their time in studying how best to understand it.

In thinking about how to interpret it literally, today I look at two basic categories of non-literal language. Non-literal means words that go beyond the dictionary meaning of words. This is used to help provide readers a more complete picture in their minds of what they are reading.

Phenomenological language describes the way things appear to the naked eye. Often things are described by the way they look when the exact science would say something different. In Joshua 10:12-13 it says - Then Joshua spoke to the Lord in the day when the Lord delivered up the Amorites before the sons of Israel, and he said in the sight of Israel, “O sun, stand still at Gibeon, And O moon in the valley of Aijalon.” So the sun stood still, and the moon stopped, Until the nation avenged themselves of their enemies. Now, did God in fact cause the earth to stop moving briefly for this to happen. Or is this language being employed to describe an incredible act of God that enabled the Israelites to win their fight.

Recently, there has been a lot of writings about a flat earth and the Bible supporting this idea. It seems that often what is termed as verses that support this idea are actually verses written with Phenomenological language. For example - Deuteronomy 28:49 says -  The Lord will bring a nation against you from far away, from the end of the earth. Flat-earth folks believe this means the earth has an end, but this is really what appears to the writer at the time and speaks more of the distance the nation is coming from.

Anthropomorphic language describes God as having human attributes, yet we know from Scripture - John 4:24-  God is spirit - and so when human attributes are given to him it simply is trying to give us a picture of the human like affection he has toward us or that he sees or is aware of all that happens.

Thus, to say that we need to interpret the Bible literally doesn't mean that every text has a literary definition as there is non-literal language in the Bible.

Promise: Understanding literary forms will assist us in not treating the Bible as something that it is not, thereby improving our interpretation of the text. Reading the Word of God carefully according to these forms will help keep us from asserting error and confusing people about the meaning of God's revelation.

Prayer: Lord, thank you for Your word and helping me to understand it and how you have communicated through many different writers over the last 4,000 years. Thank you for bringing clarity to my understanding of Your Word.

Note: I follow the readings from the Tabletalk Magazine devotional, though I am a little behind and working through 2017 devotionals. 2017 is a study of key biblical doctrines with February being about the doctrine of revelation and the various aspects of the doctrine of Scripture that sola Scriptura seeks to preserve.